Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 241-262, April 2006

Is musculoskeletal history and examination so different in paediatrics?

  • Helen E. Foster, MD FRCP, FRCPCH, DCH, Cert Med Ed (Clinical Senior Lecturer Paediatric Rheumatology)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 191 2227541; fax: +44 191 2225455.

Musculoskeletal Research Group, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Framlington Place, Catherine Cookson Building, NE2 4HH Newcastle, UK

Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, British Columbia's Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V4

Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in children and adolescents are common. The differential diagnosis is broad and based predominantly on clinical assessment. The skills both for eliciting history and for examination require understanding of the child/young person's specific emotional and cognitive developmental stage; interpretation of the findings requires knowledge of normal (and abnormal) motor and musculoskeletal growth and development. We specifically describe the different approach, unique skills and knowledge required by all clinicians who assess children and adolescents with MSK complaints; children and adolescents are not ‘just little adults’. We emphasize the importance of clinical competence in ensuring that patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis are diagnosed early and referral to specialist centres is not delayed with consequential suboptimal management and outcome. There is evidence that physician clinical skills in MSK assessment are inadequate, probably as a result of systemic deficiencies in the education process. Current and proposed solutions are discussed.

Key words: clinical skills, history taking, physical examination, growth and development, musculoskeletal, children, adolescents, gals, pgals, screening examination

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6942(05)00124-5

doi:10.1016/j.berh.2005.11.001

Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 241-262, April 2006