Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 13-24, February 2009

What have we learnt about the development and progression of early RA from RCTs?

  • David L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP (Professor of Clinical Rheumatology)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44 207 848 5215; Fax: +44 207 848 5202.

King's College School of Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College, London SE5 9RS, UK

Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) use the core set of measures proposed by consensus meetings in the 1990s; these include tender and swollen joint counts, pain, global assessments, disability, and acute-phase responders such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Trials in early RA generally assess three key outcomes based on this core data set: symptoms and signs of inflammatory arthritis, progression of disability, and erosive damage. Adverse events are also recorded. This chapter considers the lessons learned from the various trials in terms of benefits and adverse effects of different treatment regimens.

Keywords: early rheumatoid arthritis, DMARD, randomized controlled trial, placebo-controlled trial

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6942(08)00158-7

doi:10.1016/j.berh.2008.12.009

Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 13-24, February 2009