Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 789-795, December 2009
Vitamin D: What is an adequate vitamin D level and how much supplementation is necessary?
Strong evidence indicates that many or most adults in the United States and Europe would benefit from vitamin D supplements with respect to fracture and fall prevention, and possibly other public health targets, such as cardiovascular health, diabetes and cancer.
This review discusses the amount of vitamin D supplementation needed and a desirable 25-hydroxyvitamin D level to be achieved for optimal musculoskeletal health.
Vitamin D modulates fracture risk in two ways: by decreasing falls and increasing bone density. Two most recent meta-analyses of double-blind randomised controlled trials came to the conclusion that vitamin D reduces the risk of falls by 19%, the risk of hip fracture by 18% and the risk of any non-vertebral fracture by 20%; however, this benefit was dose dependent. Fall prevention was only observed in a trial of at least 700
IU vitamin D per day, and fracture prevention required a received dose (treatment dose*adherence) of more than 400
IU vitamin D per day. Anti-fall efficacy started with achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of at least 60
nmol
l−1 (24 ng
ml−1) and anti-fracture efficacy started with achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of at least 75
nmol
l−1 (30
ng ml−1) and both endpoints improved further with higher achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels.
Founded on these evidence-based data derived from the general older population, vitamin D supplementation should be at least 700–1000
IU per day and taken with good adherence to cover the needs for both fall and fracture prevention. Ideally, the target range for 25-hydroxyvitamin D should be at least 75
nmol
l−1, which may need more than 700–1000
IU vitamin D in individuals with severe vitamin D deficiency or those overweight.
Keywords: Vitamin D, falls, bone density, fractures, supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1521-6942(09)00098-9
doi:10.1016/j.berh.2009.09.005
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 789-795, December 2009
