3
Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.09.008Get rights and content

The ability of a bone to resist fracture depends on the amount of bone present, the spatial distribution of the bone mass as cortical and trabecular bone and the intrinsic properties of the bone material. Whereas low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) predicts fractures, its sensitivity and specificity is low, as over 50% of fractures occur in persons without osteoporosis by BMD testing and most women with osteoporosis do not sustain a fracture. New non-invasive imaging techniques, including three-dimensional (3D) assessments of bone density and geometry, microarchitecture and integrated measurements of bone strength such as finite element analysis (FEA), provide estimates of bone strength that can be used to increase the sensitivity and specificity of fracture risk assessment. Initial observations have shown that these techniques provide information that will improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of skeletal fragility and suggest that these techniques are likely to have a role in the clinical management of individuals at risk for fracture.

Section snippets

Criteria for evaluating new technologies

Imaging technologies must be accurate and precise and must have established quality control procedures, standardised data acquisition and analysis, as well as methods for cross-calibration of devices at different clinical centres [16]. Data that help define the clinical utility of a new imaging technique include: (1) sex- and age-specific reference data; (2) assessment of disease severity; (3) associations with fracture risk in untreated subjects; and (4) changes in the measurement with

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and aBMD

Introduced about 25 years ago, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides a quantitative assessment of mineralised bone mass at the axial and appendicular skeleton in vivo. This technique measures the attenuation of photons of two different energies during radiation transmission. Bone mineral content (BMC, g) and aBMD (g cm–2) of a region of interest are obtained. As low aBMD is a strong risk factor for fractures [17], this technique provided the basis for the World Health Organization

Conclusions

Novel non-invasive techniques for assessment of the structural determinants of bone strength are available. These techniques quantify the macro- and microstructure of bone such as bone size, shape, cortical thickness, cortical density, a surrogate of cortical porosity, trabecular number, thickness and separation. FE analysis, by combining bone geometry with material characteristics, provides good estimates of whole bone strength. Whether these strength and/or morphological features singly or

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Sharmala Majumdar, Claus Glüer, Thomas Lang and David Kopperdahl for generously providing images.

References (124)

  • S. Demissie et al.

    Proximal hip geometry is linked to several chromosomal regions: genome-wide linkage results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study

    Bone

    (2007)
  • E.A. Streeten et al.

    Autosome-wide linkage analysis of hip structural phenotypes in the Old Order Amish

    Bone

    (2008)
  • G. Sigurdsson et al.

    Increasing sex difference in bone strength in old age: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES-REYKJAVIK)

    Bone

    (2006)
  • T.F. Lang et al.

    Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures

    Bone

    (2002)
  • J.A. MacNeil et al.

    Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality

    Med Eng Phys

    (2007)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general

    (2004)
  • C.J. Rosen

    Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • E. Seeman et al.

    Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy

    Osteoporos Int

    (2007)
  • Proceedings of a symposium. Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis. October 19–20, 1990, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Am J Med

    (1991)
  • M. Bouxsein

    Biomechanics of age-related fractures

  • O. Johnell et al.

    Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2005)
  • E.S. Siris et al.

    Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures

    Arch Intern Med

    (2004)
  • S.A. Wainwright et al.

    Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2005)
  • S.R. Cummings

    How drugs decrease fracture risk: lessons from trials

    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact

    (2002)
  • S. Sarkar et al.

    Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2002)
  • N.B. Watts et al.

    Relationship between changes in BMD and nonvertebral fracture incidence associated with risedronate: reduction in risk of nonvertebral fracture is not related to change in BMD

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2005)
  • M.L. Bouxsein

    Bone quality: where do we go from here?

    Osteoporos Int

    (2003)
  • E. Seeman et al.

    Bone quality–the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • K. Engelke et al.

    Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis

    Osteoporos Int

    (2006)
  • D. Marshall et al.

    Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures

    BMJ

    (1996)
  • WHO Study Group

    Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis

    (1994)
  • D.R. Carter et al.

    New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1992)
  • T. Beck

    Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities

    Osteoporos Int

    (2003)
  • K. Uusi-Rasi et al.

    Structural effects of raloxifene on the proximal femur: results from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation trial

    Osteoporos Int

    (2006)
  • S.L. Greenspan et al.

    Effect of hormone replacement, alendronate, or combination therapy on hip structural geometry: a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2005)
  • S.L. Bonnick et al.

    DXA-based hip structural analysis of once-weekly bisphosphonate-treated postmenopausal women with low bone mass

    Osteoporos Int

    (2009)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    Hormone therapy improves femur geometry among ethnically diverse postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative hormone intervention trials

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2008)
  • G. Boivin et al.

    Contribution of raloxifene and calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation to the increase of the degree of mineralization of bone in postmenopausal women

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2003)
  • B.M. Misof et al.

    Effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone administration on bone mineralization density in iliac crest biopsies from patients with osteoporosis: a paired study before and after treatment

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2003)
  • T.J. Beck et al.

    Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2001)
  • T.J. Beck et al.

    Effects of current and discontinued estrogen replacement therapy on hip structural geometry: the study of osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2001)
  • D.A. Nelson et al.

    Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • A.C. Looker et al.

    Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry?

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2001)
  • N.J. Crabtree et al.

    Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study

    Osteoporos Int

    (2002)
  • J.A. Cauley et al.

    Longitudinal study of changes in hip bone mineral density in Caucasian and African-American women

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2005)
  • S. Kaptoge et al.

    Sex hormone status may modulate rate of expansion of proximal femur diameter in older women alongside other skeletal regulators

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2007)
  • D. Karasik et al.

    Bivariate linkage study of proximal hip geometry and body size indices: the Framingham study

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (2007)
  • P. Szulc et al.

    Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study

    Osteoporos Int

    (2006)
  • H.G. Ahlborg et al.

    Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2005)
  • F. Rivadeneira et al.

    Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2007)
  • Cited by (124)

    • Bone Quality in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review

      2023, Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text